Response: Funny as hell these ignant responses to me didn’t say anything about the other person who had a video camera. Obviously this person came to video just like I did but since I am the one calling their ignant a . . . out I guess they don’t get it that my video camera would have captured the same thing that the other person’s camera would have. LMBAO!!
I was there said…
President Graves addressed the problem the way it should have been. The candidates were not made aware of any video recording going on so they should not have been put on the spot at that moment on whether they wanted to be recorded. If any one candidate had said no – then you would have been all over them. The Forum was handled in a professional and dignified manner and if you, Mr. Dancy, wanted to make it a "knock out -drag out" I’m glad that you did not get the privilege.
Response: Candidates put on the spot at that moment on whether they wanted to be recorded. If any one candidate had said no – then you would have been all over them. Really so they have something to hide? How ignant! I would not have recorded that one person.
If I wanted to make it a “knock out-drag out.” How ignant because I don’t make the news I just record it. So whatever they did is what I would have videoed.
Get over yourself Dancy said…
If you have a blog then I hope you use better grammar than you did here. There is no such word as "mines" that would be used in this context. It also sounds like you just wanted this recorded so you could promote your own web blog. Also why is it always the first thing out of somebodies mouth is "you will be hearing from my lawyer" ?? Typical
Response: Better grammar? You got the message because if you didn’t you would not have responded. Ignant I can write however I please.
Record to promote my blog? My blog is out there all over the nation so if you think that I needed to record this forum in order to promote my blog you are ignant as hell.