Tell me them Special Cs over at WHIG-TV this morning said Reuben Blackwell should not have responded to Warren Daughtridge LoveRockyMount founder. Really!
So they think they can say what they want and Black Folk suppose to accept it. Oh hell no!
Click On Photo To Watch The Video
It is a damn shame that this Special C smart ass had the audacity to come to the meeting to go after Councilman Reuben Blackwell about something his 24 year old son Cooper Blackwell said on Warren Daughtridge’s Social Media page LoveRockyMount. Cooper called Warren and some other Special Cs out. What the Special Cs have a problem with is that they think that White Privilege is the order of the day when it comes to communicating directly and indirectly with Black Folk thinking that we ain’t suppose to respond. When we respond they think play victim. Well these Special Cs better recognize and understand that we ain’t the one. It is obvious that these Special Cs are in denial, don’t give a damn or just ignant to the fact that some Black Folk ain’t going to allow them to promote their WSBS and we are going to be silent. Oh hell no! Some Special Cs have been attacking Black Leadership faithfully since the council became a Black Majority in 2003. Check out the timeline how them asses been in the attack mode since December 2018 as they began gearing up to unseat Councilmen Andre Knight and Richard Joyner in the October Election. Visit Timeline: Rocky Mount City Manager Rochelle Small-Toney Under Fire Via Rocky Mount Telegram and read about it for yourself. However my videos don’t lie and you can watch them as well on Youtube.
This Video Is A Must See The Public Comments And Then Councilman Reuben Blackwell Put The Gang Conversation In Perspective
Click On Photo To View More Photos
This Guy Right Here Though, Damn He Was Good!
Click On Photo To Watch Video
”Don’t Blame Me!” Part 2
BY LINDELL JOHN KAY
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Rocky Mount Councilman Reuben Blackwell said he supports housing development on Tarboro Street and if he misspoke about knowledge of parking plans at the site, he’s only human.
Blackwell said in a meeting last week that he was unaware of plans to break a proposed agreement with Edgecombe Community College on downtown parking versus a housing project; but the real issue is the need for such housing.
“I stand by my position, my vote and my constituents on that location as the best site for this affordable, workforce housing development to help build the momentum of a beautiful, vibrant, diverse and economically beneficial downtown Rocky Mount that everyone can enjoy,” said Blackwell, who answered Telegram questions on the matter from Thursday on Friday morning after presstime for a report in today’s edition. (Read more)
From: Reuben Blackwell
To: Lindell Kay
cc: Kyle Stephens; Gene Metrick; Tameka Norman; David Combs; Curmilus Dancy II
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to address your questions. Thank you for showing me the email. I appreciate that you are trying to help me remember Council discussions and votes.
The email that you have selected to highlight is about present day reality with a live project and not about our original discussion and/or vote on the parking agreement with a past City administration. I asked you to bring any document to my attention that the Council has voted on with the College. Those are the discussions and vote that I do not remember. If they took place, then I’m more than willing to admit that my memory was not exact. I’m human and I do make mistakes as much as everyone else does! As I was making my comments about the “original agreement,” Lige Daughtridge held up a document. I said if I’m wrong about a discussion or vote at that time, then I did not remember. You can check my accuracy of recall on Curmilus’ video. I have not done that because I do not think that my recall is the issue or the crux of what is important. I also told you when you approached me after the Council meeting, that maybe my memory was faulty, but my stance is still the same.
I think it’s also important to recognize several factors regarding the City Council’s vote about parking at this location and our relationship with Edgecombe Community College:
The City of Rocky Mount and Edgecombe Community College have always, at least since my service on the Council, enjoyed a mutually beneficial and supportive relationship. The City has always looked for ways to support the College’s development and success in Downtown Rocky Mount. It was the City of Rocky Mount who enthusiastically embraced Dr. Lamm’s vision of a vibrant health education center in the heart of our City. It was the City of Rocky Mount who encouraged the College to consider tax credit financing to move the stalled project forward because we also recognized the need for health care infrastructure for the present and future growth and development of eastern North Carolina. And it was the City of Rocky Mount that assisted our friends and partners with Edgecombe County and the College with technical assistance and support all the way from concept to construction of the beautiful Lamm facility that our students and region are enjoying right now. In fact, I personally served on the Commission that the County appointed to build that very successful center!
As an elected representative of the Rocky Mount City Council, my primary responsibility, loyalty and duty of care belongs to the people who reside in my Ward and the overall health of my City. I will support, advocate and vote for the best interests of the people and community that I serve to the best of my ability and that aligns with the vision that my constituents have and currently articulate.
The discussions that you are referencing took place at a time where the needs of our Downtown and surrounding communities were different, as was the approach. Considering practices of equitable development, the City’s approach changed as our City’s needs evolved. All of our discussion today seems to center around an agreement that was created without the benefit of considering present day context of multiple uses. We did not have the Event Center, we were not enjoying robust development downtown, the real estate market throughout the country was in a slump and we were wrestling in Rocky Mount with the lack of engagement about downtown from owners of properties in and around that area. If we had a project then that was bringing millions of dollars of investment to that location and benefited the people that could be students and employees of the College, then I would have definitely and enthusiastically supported that project then as I do now.
Your allegations of “bait and switch” imply some nefarious context of ill will and misrepresentation of intent. That is your term, not my motivation. Not then and not now. You were present at the City Council Retreat in February when DFI presented their options, that this project would be an affordable, workforce housing development. You heard the statistics presented about need and even attested that this development would have been interesting to you if you had that option when you first moved to Rocky Mount. This development addresses the immediate crisis that hard working and retired citizens have in choosing great, affordable options for living and participating in Downtown. We must all be intentional in deeds as well as words in making space for citizens and visitors in an inclusive economy.
I am still unclear about the protestations from anyone about why, at that location, affordable workforce housing would be a bad idea. Why wouldn’t anyone want to attract working families and individuals or retired citizens or veterans or struggling families who want to better themselves and live in a vibrant downtown community right across the street from an anchor institution that was designed and funded to benefit them?
I’m certain that the City would be more than happy and motivated to help the College address their concern about lack of parking at other close and proximate locations.
I stand by my position, my vote and my constituents on that location as the best site for this affordable, workforce housing development to help build the momentum of a beautiful, vibrant, diverse and economically beneficial Downtown Rocky Mount that everyone can enjoy!
See article In Rocky Mount Telegram
The Watch Dog response: Wow! I was wondering who had put Lindell on this and then the 1st comment was Elijah Daughtridge. One thing I can say The Community Council and Lige are persistent and consistent with their passion to go after the Rocky Mount City Council. What tickles the hell out of me is that I have been actively engaged in activism since the late 80’s and I used to say to black officials what are you doing to promote jobs and other that benefit black folk and other folk like the white officials were doing. The white officials were on the boards and commissions and obtaining land and creating jobs. Well it appears that when white white businessmen and other were doing things it was ok. It appears that any time the black man begin to rise up, there is a movement to make it appear he is doing something that is not right.
A new conflict of interest policy under consideration by the Rocky Mount City Council may affect whether some council members will have a vote on certain matters — possibly including the Rocky Mount Event Center.
The proposed policy presented to the council during last week’s Committee of the Whole meeting adds federal guidelines to existing local and state rules. The guidelines apply to sub-recipients and includes apparent conflicts as well as actual conflicts.
Councilman Reuben Blackwell asked city staff about making sure the council signs all the required documents. He said he wants to make sure the council understood the policy and all it entails.
Blackwell is the president and chief executive officer of the Opportunities Industrialization Center, a nonprofit organization that helps residents with health care, job training and other programs. He earned a $141,114 salary from OIC in 2015, according to the most recent IRS tax forms made available by GuideStar, a watchdog organization that provides information on nonprofit groups. (Read more)