|
Democracy North Carolina is hiring faith-outreach Ambassadors to ensure a great Get-Out-The-Vote effort in eastern NC this election cycle! RSVP Here to attend the Eastern NC Ambassadors can help in numerous ways. From distributing voter educational materials in your church, to recruiting like-minded folks as volunteers for support voting efforts, to encouraging communities of faith to use their church vans or buses for rides to the polls, to Get Out The Vote rallies, and much more!
You can make a difference and make $100 at the same time! Half is paid out after you attend the training, the other half at the end of the election cycle. Please attend this Ambassador Training Workshop whether you want to officially sign up as an Ambassador, or whether you just want to know more about church voter outreach. This workshop is for you! Sincerely, |
Archive for the ‘Democracy NC’ Category
We’re Hiring Eastern NC Faith GOTV Ambassadors!
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on March 14, 2012
Posted in Democracy NC, GOTV Ambassadors | Leave a Comment »
Out of Control in Raleigh: Come to an Event Near You!
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on January 25, 2012
|
|
Posted in Democracy NC, NC Legislature | Leave a Comment »
Take a minute to thank G.K. Butterfield (Co-sponsor HR 2517)–Source: Democracy NC
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on November 1, 2011
|
|
Dear Curmilus, I am happy to report that G.K. Butterfield is the first NC member of Congress to co-sponsor to the proposed Shareholder Protection Act (HR 2517), which would require corporations to receive shareholder approval for political spending. Please take a minute to thank him for co-sponsoring HR 2517. The Shareholder Protection Act is an important step toward rolling back the impact of the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. That notorious ruling gave corporations and unions a green light to spend unlimited funds on election advocacy and led to record spending during the 2010 election cycle. As we move toward the 2012 Presidential Election, corporate interests are already gearing up to spend even larger amounts of cash. It’s time to cut the strings of corporate influence over our elections process! Congressman Butterfield has taken an important step in the right direction. Please thank Rep. Butterfield today. Alternatively or additionally, you can thank Rep. Butterfield and educate others by sending a letter to the editor to your local newspaper. If you are interested in doing this and need more information, please call me at 919-360-2430. Thank you! Molly Beacham, Democracy NC |
Posted in Congressman G. K. Butterfield, Democracy, Democracy NC, HR 2517 | Leave a Comment »
Respect & Protect Our Vote Rally! Wednesday, July 13 at 11:00 AM in Raleigh
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on July 12, 2011
|
|
|
Posted in Democracy NC, NAACP NC | Leave a Comment »
Hall: Voter ID requirement would hurt seniors, Dems – Source: WRAL
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on March 7, 2011
A new report from political watchdog group Democracy NC says a Republican proposal to require photo ID at the voting booth would be a barrier to nearly half a million registered voters in North Carolina. (Read more)
Posted in Democracy NC, Republicans, Voter ID | Leave a Comment »
White Republican Men Lead Record Pace of Early Voting – Source: Democracy North Carolina
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on October 19, 2010
For Immediate Release, Oct. 18, 2010:
White Republican Men Lead Record Pace of Early Voting
After three days, one-stop early voting is off to a record-shattering pace for midterm elections and the largest group casting ballots are white Republican men, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan group Democracy North Carolina. (Summary totals at end.)
Two years ago, black Democratic women led all groups in the 17-day early voting period and propelled Barack Obama to a surprise victory in the Tar Heel state. The remarkable shift to GOP men echoes polling data about the Republican tide this year, although after three days of voting, the total number of one-stop ballots cast by all Democrats still exceeds those of Republicans.
“Early voting doesn’t favor one party or another, but reveals who’s most organized and enthusiastic about making their voices heard,” said Bob Hall, director of Democracy North Carolina, which has tracked the evolution of early voting. “Combined with the opportunity for same-day registration, our state’s early voting process is essentially a tool of empowerment and convenience.”
After three days, a total of 72,173 voters have cast one-stop ballots. That’s more than twice the 35,728 cast at the same point in the previous midterm election of 2006 and even more than the 70,645 in the 2004 presidential election. In 2008, a surprising 266,649 voters crowded one-stop centers in the first three days.
So far this year, registered Democrats are edging out Republicans by 31,910 to 27,623. By contrast, after three days in 2008, Democrats were swamping Republicans by nearly a 3-to-1 ratio – at that point, 163,321 votes to 58,748.
The county with the most early votes so far in 2010 is not Wake or Mecklenburg but coastal Brunswick County, where eight voting centers and hotly contested local, state and Congressional contests reinforce a tradition of early turnout. Setting the pattern for the state, white Republican men led the county followed by white Republican women.
Wilson County, where tea party supporters are backing a white independent candidate against the black Democratic candidate for sheriff, is another center of early robust turnout; it ranked 6th among the 100 counties after three day of early voting. African-American Democratic women lead among the demographic groups in Wilson.
Other counties among the top ten are New Hanover, Alamance, Wayne, Henderson, Chatham, Johnston, Gaston and Caldwell. For a county-by-county chart of turnout for October 14 through October 16, go to http://www.democracy-nc.org/downloads/EarlyVoting2010First3DaysCountySumm.xls
Early voting continues through Saturday, October 30 at 1 pm. Counties have different schedules, including multiple locations and evening hours in some cases. Seven counties offer the convenience of Sunday afternoon voting which turned out to be the most intensive hours of early voting in 2008.
Total Votes at One-Stop Early Voting Centers
Election Year First Three Day Total Period
2010 72,173
2008 266,649 2.4 million
2006 35,728 372,020
2004 70,645 707,628
2002 13,110 170,543
Data from files at the State Board of Elections. The counts for 2002-2008 are for ballots accepted, not just those cast.
See related:
Republican White Men Casting Early Votes In Droves
Posted in Democracy NC, Early Voting, Elections 2010, Elections November 2, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
(IRV) New boxes on the ballot – instant runoffs – Source: Salisbury Post
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on September 19, 2010
Voters across the state will see something new on the ballot this fall, and they should applaud it as a pragmatic money-saving improvement in the elections process.
A small but determined platoon of opponents will try to depict this positive change as a conspiracy by a villainous fill-in-the-blank force — the Democrats, the Republicans, the establishment, the computer industry — to undermine democracy. Voters ought to listen instead to their own common sense. Instant runoff voting will save them a second trip to the polls and it will save the state up to $5 million. (Read more)
Note: I totally agree with gg and Joyce McCloy I had the opportunity to sit on am IRV presentation in Rocky Mount NC. I am not in favor of the IRV for all the reasons gg and McCloy to name a few. C. Dancy II – DCN Publisher
See related:
Posted in Chris, Chris Telesca, Democracy NC, From the Publisher, Instant Runoff Vote, IRV, Joyce McCloy NC Coalition for Verified Voting | Leave a Comment »
Thoughts After the Easley Hearings by Bob Hall Director Democracy NC
Posted by Curmilus Dancy II (Butch) on November 2, 2009

![]()
Dear Democracy NC Advocates,
When a politician cheats or steals, the media loves to play "gotcha" and the public is outraged. But what if the rules of the campaign system invite a candidate to cheat and lie in order to win election?
Will the media and public demand that the system change? And will they praise the politician who acts ethically and still wins? Why don’t politicians like House Speaker Joe Hackney or state Treasurer Janet Cowell get more kudos for their leadership on ethics and efforts to reform the campaign finance system? It’s easy to criticize, but so much harder to take responsibility for fixing the problem.
Earlier this year, The News & Observer identified a number of travel-related donations the Mike Easley Committee failed to report and the State Board of Elections began investigating the Committee. In July, Democracy North Carolina provided additional information and urged the State Board of Elections to investigate if the NC Democratic Party was "being used by a candidate as a conduit to launder earmarked donations that would be illegal if they were given directly to that candidate."
We acted because cheating in politics hurts voters and the good candidates who abide by the law.
On Friday, the State Board of Elections found that earmarking had occurred. By a unanimous vote, the Board ordered the Democratic Party to forfeit the $9,000 involved in two earmarked donations and, more importantly, sent an important message that it is illegal for a candidate to use a political party to conduit a donor’s funds back to the candidate’s campaign, particularly when the donor, candidate and party conspire together to evade the normal contribution limits for a candidate. We commend the Board for taking this action.
The Board took a cautious approach in reaching its decision. Memos, detailed strategy plans, emails, ledger sheets, and other documents revealed that a specific "Governor’s Fund" had been set up within the Democratic Party to receive and spend money raised for the Mike Easley campaign, but most witnesses could not recall or simply denied any earmarking occurred. The Board focused its penalty on two donors who admitted they knew their checks to the party were really for the Easley campaign.
The Board also voted to impose a $100,000 fine on the Mike Easley Committee and to refer former Governor Easley "and others" involved in the hearing to the district attorney. It’s a sad day when evidence justifies referring a governor for criminal investigation, but it’s in the best interest of the public and of the thousands of candidates who are acting properly for the State Board to make it clear that no one is above the law. In another unanimous vote, the Board recommended that the General Assembly amend state law to require the candidate to personally bear the cost of fines imposed as a result of election law violations if the candidate’s campaign committee is too broke to pay. Again, the Board sends a strong message that candidates must be held accountable for the conduct of their campaign.
After sitting through the hearings, I’ve been wondering about what to do with good and bad politicians:
- We need, and all candidates need, the protection of strong laws, fairly enforced, to weed out the cheaters and hold everyone accountable. But no set of regulations can prevent immoral candidates and their consultants from using loopholes to channel large amounts of private money into a campaign. More regulation alone won’t produce better public officials.
- We need more candidates with the personal moral strength to withstand the temptations and pressures of raising large amounts of private money for their campaigns. As the costs climb and the campaign’s consultants devise new methods to skirt the law, fewer candidates can hold on to their core values. How can we help them?
- We need to provide honorable candidates with an alternative campaign system that helps them stay focused on serving the public, rather than become preoccupied with soliciting the next $4,000 or $50,000 check from a donor with a selfish agenda. The voluntary public financing program for some candidates in North Carolina and in other states provides that alternative, because it rewards candidates who raise small donations and reject large donations with a public grant to run their campaign under strict rules.
- We need to tell good candidates and public officials that we appreciate their service. We hurt ourselves by not noticing who is doing a good job or by stereotyping all politicians as corrupt. Good government requires many solid leaders and participation by all of us.
What do you think? Please send me your comments and let me know your thoughts on how we can turn this sad situation for North Carolina into a step toward positive electoral reform.
Sincerely,
Bob Hall, Director
Democracy North Carolina
![]()
If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.

Note: Sign up to receive Democracy NC information directly to your inbox.
Posted in Democracy NC | Leave a Comment »






