Why would anyone in their right mind vote to hire a Superintendent as a contractor when the system is paying a Superintendent $145,000 a year? Something just don’t makes sense. Hell those who voted don’t make sense.
If this Superintendent needs a consultant, a mentor or whatever then why is he still employed? It appears somebody messed up when the new Superintendent was hired.
Just couldn’t get this Superintendent/Consultant thing out of my mind. So maybe it is me who ain’t in my right mind.
See related:
